Hey guys and gals! I'm a bit perplexed and perturbed. What is the deal with the term "entry level bass"?! Entry level to me is code for "cheap". I understand not many of us have a Warwick Corvette with SVT full stack with a board full of pedals with MIDI budget but really, ENTRY level? I think the term does a disservice to the beginner. You go out you buy an insert your who's who brand here and BAM! All of a sudden the beginner is spending more time at the GC butcher, I mean repair technician spending there pennies instead of learning! IMHO the places that all of these guys go wrong is in the electronics and the bridge! The electronics will work right if the assembly is correct and come on for pete's sake use better hardware for the bridge saddles! Rant over and always friends, Keep 'em straight up there!
I simply can't agree with you that most so called entry level basses are basses of bad quality, as you describe it.
Personally I play an Ibanez Mikro as my main, which I admittedly swapped the stock pickups on, a bass that can be had for about 180$ from new, and I never owned a bass that felt more comfortable playing, despite the fact of having owned some 1000+$ basses.
Also my Mikro has a real stable neck with no sharp frets sticking out, it stays in tune nicely and have no fret buzz even at fairly low action.
When that is said I think I can agree with you, if that was even one of your points, that it doesn't do the beginner a favor to start out on a bass of poor quality, and as such I guess you are right that the very term entry level instrument doesn't make much sense and is somewhat misleading.
