Wow, I totally missed the bonus package with the bass. I wonder if I were to sell her off, what that would bring the price of the bass down to? Maybe $8000?
I'm not sure, you may want to check your State laws... but in California we can't sell children.
We can buy them. But then we have to keep them, except in cases where we can lease them to others for work. But that isn't a purchase to own lease, it's more a child-labor thing for textile factory owners and mining operations.
The problem is that we have a surplus of work-eligible children available for lease, but most of the factories that would have leased them, have moved to other countries because the kids there are even cheaper.
It's really a no-win situation. Yeah. On second thought, the deal for this NS-2 even with the kid and violin isn't a very good deal.
__________________________
On a more serious note, I've noticed a trend lately that several original Brooklyn Era owners are putting their guitars up for sale and asking astronomical prices for them.
It's interesting to me that although historical sales data just doesn't support the asking prices they're listing for, people are (what I guess they're doing) just arbitrarily picking numbers out of the air.
I'd pay him $2000.00 for that bass and not a penny more... that's if I could inspect it and confirm it was all original in mint/excellent condition. It's a dot-neck Brooklyn with a natural finish and brand new in 1982 when it was made it cost $1,999.00 retail, which means he might have gotten it for less.
A break even scenario for a 30 year old bass isn't bad. And he's been able to enjoy it for 30 years.
Regardless of how noble his desire to help his daughter is, I just don't think a penny over $2,000 is acceptable for that bass, and many of you know that not even 5 years ago several nice Brooklyn NS-2 models were selling off for $1500 and some for less.