Not entirely sure. I actually played through it a number of years back, before I owned any of my own Sunn. It's not in the best condition if I recall, but the guy I talked to (a guitarist I know) said the guy was selling it dirt cheap, mostly just wanted to get rid of it. It's a 60w with verb and trem, either a Sceptre or a Sentura. Then I could have the Big Boy rig (2000s+2x15/1200s+2x15) and the Kiddie rig (200s+1x15/Sceptre+1x15).
Lol, that sounds really cool. I like that the small rig is still actually pretty big.
What kind of jing you looking to drop? Sky's the limit if you've got the dough. If you are looking at going all-in, I'd go with a Dunwich. You know him, you've seen the work, you have reviews from people you know and trust in regard to tone, you can customize it however you two decide would fit your needs. Seem pretty simple to me.
If I were going to spend Hi Tone like money, I'm going Dunwich.
Yeah, if I were going to get custom amp stuff, it would be Dunwich, probably. Verellens are cool, too, but I doubt they'd be quite as flexible as Dunwich.
Here's a full track from that Red Fang + The Ocean 2 drummers 2 bassists band RED KUNZ. Pretty cool stuff imo:
I guess I was kinda hoping it would be slower and heavier.
I've been lookin for sleepers for sure. I'll plug into just about any older tube amp I can get my hands on. Figured I could play a slave with no pre or use my tone hammer got a while till I find another suitable pedal pre.
Get a Trace V8, lol.
Someone give me a breakdown on their experience with P versus reverse P.
Ready go.
I prefer reverse P. I always feel like I can hear a pretty stark tone difference between the strings on regular P, due to the D and G being noticeably twangier than the E and A. Reverse P I feel results in the E and A having a bit more bite and the D and G having a bit more fullness, and so creating more even tone across all four.
P:if you don't know what that sounds like I can't help.
Reverse P: Similar but the E&A strings are little less "thick" in tone. Where as the D&G are a little more. I dig them allot. Hard to find passive ones that aren't entry level bullshiit.
One day I'll make my own with the whole pickup just a smidge closer to the neck for better bass response across all strings.
Yeah, basically this. Though I'd move it slightly towards the bridge, instead, as I prefer the Ric bridge pickup position to the regular P position.
Yeah, earlier than MkIV they use a passive tone stack, I don't know of any specific way to tell them apart other than looking at the plate with the model name on the back. They probably have some aesthetic differences, but I'm not aware of what they are. I've heard people say they don't like the active ones, but I found it incredibly useful to have an active mid control in an amp like that. Plus, you could just dime everything out for maximum gain. I had occasionally used a setup with mine where I dimed all the controls, jumped channels, ran a clean boost into it and used a graphic eq to adjust the tone.
Possibly, but I also live in an area where we get fresh fish easily. The Monterey Bay is a fishing area and being on the west coast in general. I've also only had a messed up sense of smell since high school and I've loved weird sharp cheeses since I was a little kid.
Interesting. I'd been curious about Sound City amps, but held off because I heard conflicting things about the EQ. Some said they were similar to Hiwatts, which, while cool, have a useless passive mid. I might look out for a MkIV or later Sound City in the future, now knowing they have an active EQ. I prefer active EQ for bass, passive for guitar.
That probably weighs 86 pounds.
86 pounds of awesome.
Some stoner thing. What's your avatar?
Today's work soundtrack: Yo-Yo Ma plays Ennio Morricone. All the cool Morricone soundtracks.
That has to be amazing.
Wait.
So if I run:
Out of my amp
Into a 4ohm cab
Out of that cab
Into another 4ohm cab
That is series @ 8ohms?
But I can't run series unless my head is wired that way?
No. Both of those are parallel.
You need a series box to run series.
Ok. Why the hell do they even put outputs on these cabs (ampeg 810/610s) then?
Because a lot of older amps don't have very many output jacks. To allow for flexibility in how you set up your rig in terms of space. Because some amps do go down to 2 ohms.
Doesn't he always squint.
lol I was in total agreement with you on this is how it is, then I had to read two pages of NOO! Nothing like waking up to feeling dumb.
Why is that?
Share for everyone or pm me in addition to deth. I got a box and jacks laying around, good little project to do.
Apparently Clint Eastwood actually hated those cigars, but deliberately used them because he felt that their unpleasant taste helped him get the right facial expression for the Man With No Name.
I can always add a series/parallel box to run two 4 Ohm cabs at full power. I dont always get full power in to an 8 Ohm cab.
That said, there is really only a few 8 Ohm cabs on the market that interest me.
Eh, I'm more a fan of low power, big cab. But then again, I don't use solid state power amps.
I actually hate small cabs that are less than 8 ohms, because I feel like they're mostly for marketing shill ("get all the power from your amp!") when the poor drivers can't actually take that much power.
Cool bass.
I'd prefer it as a 4-string, though.